Anthropic Publishes Responsible Scaling Policy 3.0 with New Frontier Risk Process

What changed in RSP 3.0

Anthropic published an updated Responsible Scaling Policy on February 24, 2026. The document outlines how the company intends to align model capability growth with safety and security controls before deployment. In this revision, Anthropic highlights three core additions: a Frontier Safety and Security Framework, Frontier Safety Roadmaps and Risk Reports, and clearer risk-threshold commitments tied to release decisions.

Framework-level significance

The most important shift is operational detail. Previous AI safety statements across the industry often focused on principles, while this update emphasizes process artifacts that can be tracked over time. By introducing formal roadmaps and risk reports, Anthropic is signaling that risk management should be auditable and staged rather than an implicit internal judgement made only at launch time.

The policy framing also reinforces a governance norm that advanced model deployment should remain conditional. Anthropic states that if risk thresholds are crossed and mitigations are not sufficient, the system should not be deployed. That conditional approach matters because it connects capability progress to explicit gates, rather than assuming safety work will automatically keep pace.

Why this matters for AI governance

RSP 3.0 arrives as governments and enterprise buyers increasingly ask for concrete assurance models, not generic trust language. Procurement teams, regulators, and infrastructure partners want evidence that frontier-model organizations can define, monitor, and enforce clear stop conditions. A published policy with named mechanisms provides a stronger baseline for third-party scrutiny and internal accountability.

For the wider AI ecosystem, the practical question is implementation depth. The presence of frameworks and reports is valuable, but impact depends on how often evaluations run, which metrics trigger intervention, and how transparently outcomes are communicated after major model updates. Even so, this release is a material policy signal: frontier labs are being pushed toward safety governance that is procedural, testable, and linked to real deployment decisions.