SWE-rebench January 2026 Snapshot Highlights a Tight Race in Coding Agents

What the Reddit post reported

A highly upvoted LocalLLaMA thread shared January 2026 SWE-rebench results on 48 fresh GitHub PR tasks. The setup follows an agentic SWE-bench style workflow: models read real issue context, modify code, run tests, and are counted as solved only when full suites pass. The post’s headline numbers put Claude Code (Opus 4.6) at 52.9% resolved and 70.8% pass@5, with Claude Opus 4.6 and gpt-5.2-xhigh close behind at 51.7%.

Open model standings and cost discussion

The same post highlighted Kimi K2 Thinking (43.8%), GLM-5 (42.1%), Qwen3-Coder-Next (40.0%), and MiniMax M2.5 (39.6%) as leading open-model performers in this snapshot. On the benchmark site, additional notes emphasize that MiniMax M2.5 remains among low-cost options and that Qwen3-Coder-Next shows strong pass@5 despite a relatively small active-parameter footprint. Community comments in the thread focused on practical deployment variables such as provider differences and caching support.

Methodology caveats matter

The benchmark page also warns about potential contamination windows, model-release date alignment, and varying agent run settings. It documents non-trivial details like tool permissions, headless execution flags, and token accounting assumptions, which can materially change measured outcomes. That means leaderboard comparisons are useful directional signals, but procurement or architecture decisions should still be validated in workload-specific tests.

Why this is significant for 2026 teams

The main signal is convergence: frontier closed models still lead, but open models are closer in coding-agent tasks than many teams expected. For engineering organizations, this increases the importance of evaluation pipelines that include quality, latency, and cost under the exact operational stack they plan to ship. The Reddit discussion plus SWE-rebench update together offer a practical snapshot of where coding agents stand right now, and why fine-grained benchmarking methodology is now a first-class engineering concern.

Reddit discussion thread