China forces Meta to unwind Manus, turning AI deals into a sovereignty test

TechCrunch reported on April 27 that China has blocked Meta’s roughly $2 billion acquisition of Manus and ordered the deal unwound. That is bigger than a difficult merger review. Beijing is signaling that advanced AI talent, agent software, and the companies carrying them abroad are now strategic assets that may be treated more like semiconductors than like ordinary startup inventory.

According to the report, China’s National Development and Reform Commission said it was prohibiting foreign investment in the Manus project and requiring the parties to withdraw the transaction. No detailed explanation was offered. But the backdrop is obvious. Manus is one of the best-known names in the new agent wave, marketing software that can handle multi-step tasks such as app building, market research, and budget preparation. Meta wanted that capability folded into its broader AI push.

The complication is that this is not an early-stage deal frozen before integration began. TechCrunch says around 100 Manus employees had already moved into Meta’s Singapore offices by March, and the founders had taken on executive roles. The outlet also noted reports that key Manus leaders were under exit bans in mainland China. In other words, the code, the people, and the corporate org chart have already started to intermingle. Unwinding a transaction in that condition is messy by design.

The deal had always carried unusual geopolitical weight. Manus moved from China to Singapore, Meta said the acquisition would eliminate continuing Chinese ownership, and Washington had already started asking whether U.S. capital and platform power were absorbing strategically important Chinese AI work. Beijing’s answer now appears to be that relocation does not erase origin when the technology is considered nationally important.

The broader implication goes beyond Meta. China is telling founders, U.S. acquirers, and global investors that AI mergers can become sovereignty tests even after a company redomiciles and staff relocate. That mirrors the logic the U.S. has used with export controls and investment restrictions, but from the other side. The next wave of AI dealmaking will have to price in something venture firms hate: not just technical diligence and antitrust risk, but the possibility that governments decide the product, the team, or the model lineage cannot leave cleanly at all.