LocalLLaMA Debates RotorQuant as a Cheaper KV Cache Compression Path

r/LocalLLaMA picked up RotorQuant because it attacks a very specific bottleneck in LLM inference: how to compress KV cache without paying the full cost of dense rotations. Scrya describes RotorQuant as a rethinking of Google's TurboQuant. Instead of multiplying each vector by a full d x d random orthogonal matrix, it uses Clifford rotors in Cl(3,0) and computes a rotor sandwich product.

The speed claim comes from the arithmetic difference. On the project page, a d=128 vector needs about 100 multiply-adds with the rotor approach instead of 16,384 for the dense matrix path. The same page says fused kernels deliver 10-19x speedups on NVIDIA CUDA and 9-31x on Apple Metal, while cutting parameter count 44x, from 16,399 to 372. On real KV cache data from Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Scrya reports attention fidelity of 0.990 versus 0.991 for TurboQuant.

Why the post resonated

LocalLLaMA cares about this kind of work because local inference bottlenecks are often about memory movement and kernel efficiency rather than just model size. The Reddit post emphasized that the fused kernel keeps more of the operation in registers and avoids the memory round-trips of a BLAS GEMM. It also highlighted perfect 9/9 needle-in-haystack results at all tested bit widths and said that, with QJL correction, real-model retrieval quality can match or sometimes beat the TurboQuant baseline on top-1 and top-5 retrieval.

At the same time, the thread did not treat RotorQuant as a free replacement. The post itself notes higher synthetic MSE on random unit vectors, and commenters questioned whether the method is a theoretical drop-in replacement for TurboQuant or a clever engineering trade that works well on the distributions that matter most in practice. That caveat is important. The value of RotorQuant is not that it magically erases tradeoffs, but that it tries to exchange a mathematically heavier global rotation for a much cheaper structured operation while keeping real-model attention fidelity close enough to matter.

That is why the thread stood out. For LocalLLaMA readers, this is less about flashy benchmark marketing and more about whether geometric tricks can turn KV cache compression into something fast enough for consumer NVIDIA cards and Apple Silicon. If the reported speedups hold up outside the project page, RotorQuant points to a useful direction: future LLM efficiency work may come as much from better kernels and better structure as from better quantizers alone.